Tuesday, 26 June 2012

1985 Van Morrison Interview


Van Morrison Interview
by Stephen Davis

(from the August, 1985 edtion of New Age magazine)

Van Morrison was standing patiently in the lobby of the Charles Hotel in Cambridge's Harvard Square, waiting to check in. Slight, balding, non-descript in blue blazer and tan slacks, the 40-year-old Irish-born singer-one of the great stars of his generation-had just flown in from Toronto, where the night before he had opened his first North American tour in six years.
 
The last time I had seen the notoriously sensitive and volatile Morrison had been at a 1979 New York concert where something about the show -the sound, the audience, perhaps the band- had bothered him and he had walked off stage after only four of his beautiful, visionary songs. Now he stood unrecognised in the hotel lobby, looking alternately pained, bored, and brooding. What, I wondered, did this blank expression portend for our imminent interview and that night's concert?
 
For a so-called pop singer he is oddly somber and religious. As in a gospel performance, his earthy, barely contained singing lends human drama to what are essentially meditations on spiritual and abstract themes. Along with his friend Bob Dylan, Van Morrison has a palpable moral authority that is unequalled by any contemporary singer save perhaps Stevie Wonder.
 
However, this undeniable authority is also accompanied by the usual eccentric personality that so often comes as part of the package with great artists. Van Morrison has often been described as temperamental, dour, and slightly paranoid about the press. Almost all requests for interviews have been routinely turned down. Van Morrison videos are hardly staples of MTV. Both musicians and journalists seem slightly afraid of Morrison; the former say he is awe-inspiring and difficult to work with, while the latter have on more than one occasion been victims of a sarcasm that can be absolutely withering.
 
Yet the man who spoke into my tape recorder over a preconcert supper of scallops, cigarettes, and coffee was anything but frightening. Rather, he projected the air of someone who has been hurt in life and so responds to the world with a wary and vulnerable watchfulness. He answered my questions to the best of his naturally taciturn ability. When pressed on a topic he didn't wish to discuss, he simply refused or said, "Next question." This cultivated aura of vulnerability and poetic detachment managed to keep even as avid a Van Morrison fan as I am at arm's length. I couldn't lay a glove on him--out of pure respect.
 
At his Boston show that night, I noticed that the members of the great Van Morrison Band seemed to treat their boss with the same deference. When first the stage monitors and then the cord to his Les Paul guitar failed at the beginning of the show, the other musicians clustered around him protectively, solicitously. Band leader Pee Wee Ellis, who cut his teeth with James Brown's band, glowered at the roadies as they scurried around trying to fix things. Van Morrison just stood there without his guitar and sang in his Anglo-Irish tenor, barely acknowledging the enraptured audience, barely even moving, his expression running the gamut from thoughtful to grumpy to perturbed. He interwove his own songs with tributes to Chicago blues ("Baby, Please Don't Go"), Memphis soul ("Green Onions"), and favourite singers -- Ray Charles, Mose Allison (who opened the show), and the late Jackie Wilson. At the end of a brilliant show, highlighted by "Rave On, John Donne," "Summertime in England" (which includes references to Samuel Taylor Coleridge and William Wordsworth smoking dope in Kendal), and a heartbreaking encore of "Tupelo Honey," the audience stood on its feet and cheered for more than five minutes. But Van refused to come out. The show was over. The poet had returned to his private reverie.

Stephen Davis: Van, your most recent songs, especially the spiritual content of your last few albums, has given a lot of inspiration to me and to people I'm interested in. What about your own inspiration? In your recent music--"Haunts of Ancient Peace," "Ancient of Days," "Celtic Ray," "Aryan Mist," "Northern Muse"--there's a palpable respect for what might be called "white roots," the great Celtic traditions as filtered through the visions of William Blake.
Van Morrison: Well, "Ancient of Days" is from the Blake poetry. Allen Ginsberg has had similar kinds of inspiration and experience. I spoke to him about Blake a couple of weeks ago, actually.
SD: In London?
VM: Yeah, so that's coming from that lineage. Naropa just put out a book in which Ginsberg explains his own visionary experience, not on drugs, and it sounds like the same as mine. I just read this a few weeks back, but his experience is the same as mine as far as the *way* poetry happens, which I think is in the Blakean lineage. When I was growing up in Ireland, my father had been to America, and he'd come back, and he was interested in jazz music, gospel music, and he had loads of these albums. So my exposure to black American music at that time was greater than to Irish music. We did sing Irish music in my family, but we were very into blues as well. And that sort of came together for me in "Irene, Good Night" by Leadbelly. The Irish tradition and the blues tradition merged in that one song, you know? Eventually, in the sixties when I started my first bands, my influence then was more R&B, for want of a better word. I was R&B oriented at that point. So the "folk" element of the music I was into was sort of buried temporarily. But I suppose I've come back around again to that basic folk element I started with. But at the same time I'm still very much into integrating R&B into that.
SD: On your Inarticulate Speech of the Heart album, you gave special thanks to L. Ron Hubbard, the developer of Scientology. Have you met or worked with Hubbard?
VM: No, I just happened to be in a good mood that night. I mean, that was it. Nothing more than that.
SD: It would seem to follow that you've been inspired by Hubbard and his teachings at some point....
VM: No. You see, that was misunderstood. That was only my personal thing. It had nothing to do with the music. That was me personally, putting that on. It had nothing to do with being inspired musically, but I just forgot how the press system operates when I was doing it, so I've had a lot of questions like that, and I've had to explain that.
SD: I've seen reports in the British press that you are or were teaching Scientology on a part-time basis in London.
VM: No, not true.
SD: But the subject of Scientology must resonate for you, especially these days when many prominent Scientology people are going public to defend the organisation.
VM: I don't really want to comment on Scientology because there's too much bad publicity about it. That's the reason why I don't even want to touch that. Because I figure that if anyone really wants to find out about it, they have to do it themselves.
SD: You are obviously widely read. Is it true that you left school at 14?
VM: That's right.
SD: When did you start playing music?
VM: I started playing at 12. I was just on my own.
SD: Playing saxophone?
VM: No, guitar. I started out playing folk music before this whole rock-and-roll thing came about. When I was 15, I went to work with a rock R&B band. It was a show band, but it was a show band that was making a transition into rhythm and blues, which was very rare in those days.
SD: On your new album, you again raid William Blake for lyrics. Your song "Let The Slave" is adapted from "The Price of Experience," while a great deal of the imagery in 'A Sense of Wonder' is drawn from the Irish mystical poet William Butler Yeats. I understand that the album was even delayed because the Yeats estate demanded that a Yeats lyric be removed from the album.
VM: Well, I really wish it hadn't been so blown up by the press. To tell you the truth, I'm sort of reluctant to talk about it, because it was actually a bit of stupidity.
SD: What verse did you try to use?
VM: Oh, it wasn't a verse. It was a section of "Crazy Jane and God." We were told by the Yeats estate that they wouldn't give us permission to put this song on the album, right? So I thought about it for a couple of days, and I thought, OK, fine. I figured I was doing them a favour, you know? But they said that Yeats had only intended the lines to be put to so-called classical music. So I thought, Fine. I mean, my songs are better than Yeats, so we'll see ya. I don't need that. That was it, simply.
SD: So you substituted a Mose Allison song.
VM: That's right.
SD: A Sense of Wonder begins with a song called "Tore Down a la Rimbaud." It's a song that resonates for me because it's about artistic block and lack of inspiration.
VM: I'd been reading Arthur Rimbaud when I got the original idea, particularly "Illuminations." Is that what it's called? Actually, the idea for the song is ten or twelve years old. I sort of rewrote it last year and recorded it.
SD: Is it fair to say the song is about writer's block?
VM: That's what it *is* about, because at the time I got the idea, I wasn't writing anything at all. And I didn't really understand why. It was very frustrating.
SD: Rimbaud believed that true art could only be produced through what he called "constant and systematic derangement of the senses." To this aesthetic end, he smoked a lot of hashish.
VM: I prefer coffee, personally.
SD: "The Master's Eyes" is an amazing devotional chant on your new album. At the risk of absurdity, did you have any particular master in mind?
VM: No, it's not really a specific master in mind. It's the Master within, that's what it is.
SD: What about "Let The Slave"? It is taken from one of William Blake's most powerful and transcendent visions. One doesn't expect to see this kind of emotion on a pop album.
VM: But it's all so *timeless*, I think. The lyric on that is relevant anytime.
SD: There's also an homage to Ray Charles on the new album.
VM: I discovered Ray Charles on my own. That album--Ray Charles Live At Newport--I mean, I used to listen to that album for *hours*. I mean, I sort of got carried away. I was very influenced by Ray and other people when I was starting out, but there came a point when I found my own voice. And then I found myself influencing lots of people after I had originated something.
SD: Let's talk about that. Bruce Springsteen, Bob Seger...
VM: Yeah...yeah!
SD: ...Elvis Costello, Graham Parker, Daryl Hall all grew up with and were obviously influenced by your music. Do you get a twinge hearing yourself in the music they're putting out?
VM: Well, I do now. You see, for a long time I'd never even heard of these people, because I don't really listen to pop radio or any of that. I have my own preferences for music and my own albums that I play. So I'm not really influenced by what the media are running through. For years people have been saying to me--you know, *nudge, nudge*--have you heard this guy Springsteen? You should really check him out! I just ignored it. Then four or five months ago I was in Amsterdam, and a friend of mine put on a video. Springsteen came on the video, and that was the first time I ever saw him, and he's definitely ripped me off. There's no doubt about that. Not only did Springsteen...I mean, he's even ripped my movements off as well. My seventies movements, you know what I mean? *This* stuff [demonstrates].
SD: You mentioned listening to records. What's on your turntable these days?
VM: I always keep going back to the old blues stuff--Howlin' Wolf, Sonny Boy Williamson, John Lee Hooker. But I don't really listen to a lot of music at present. I do like some of the Alan Stivell stuff.
SD: The Breton harper who's interested in Celtic revival.
VM: Yeah, good music. A different stream of Celtic music. It relates to the Irish stuff I grew up with. But I like *any* good music. I still listen to JB [James Brown] just for pure enjoyment. I mean, you know, everybody should listen to James Brown first thing in the morning, for medical reasons.
SD: You mean for psychic hygiene?
VM: Right.
SD: Your career and Dylan's parallel each other in many way, both musically and especially thematically. I'm thinking of the religious awakening you both experienced in the late seventies.
VM: Yeah, but I think some of that was coincidence.
SD: What was that tour like?
VM: I was doing a U.K. tour, and we got a call to open for Dylan in Paris, so we went to Paris, and my band did a set before he came on. Then they asked me to come along to Wembley [Stadium in London], and I sat in with him and Eric Clapton.
SD: What did you and Dylan sing together?
VM: We did "It's All Over Now, Baby Blue" in London and "Tupelo Honey" later in Dublin.
SD: What do you think of Bob Dylan?
VM: I think Dylan's great. He's *got* it, he's an originator, and there's only one of 'em--one in every generation.
SD: In the Irish paper 'Hot Press' I saw an interesting three-way interview between you, Dylan, and Bono Vox [singer for the successful young Irish band U2]. Bono asked what sixties music he should be listening to, and you answered the Yardbirds. I thought that rather odd, since you were the singer for Them [his early group]...
VM: Yeah, well, I actually said *Yardbirds* because I felt sort of embarrassed when we were talking about sixties music. I was trying to be diplomatic and not put the arrow right in the bull's eye because I *was* going to say *Them*. But I didn't say Them ecause I figured that somewhere along the line he must have missed a connection on the Irish music scene, but I didn't want to say it that way.
SD: U2 is the first Irish band to hit big in America. Their music, like yours, is often described as very passionate and spiritual. Have you heard them?
VM: I've heard some of their stuff, yeah. I like some of the messages in the songs. The messages are good. It's not my cup of tea otherwise.
SD: You record in a Bay Area studio called Tres Virgos. You are a Virgo yourself. Does astrology interest you?
VM: Um...a little bit.
SD: Charlie Parker, John Coltrane, and other great musicians were also born under Virgo. It seems to be a good musicians' sign.
VM: It seems to be. You're right there. It's a good sign for musicians from the point of view of getting shapes on things, because Virgos have that analytical thing going. Very often, when you're making steps in arranging music, you have to analyse the various stages, and that Virgo thing is helpful.
SD: My favourite song of yours is called "Cleaning Windows." The lyrics have to do with the dignity and pleasure of work and involve a narrative about cleaning windows during the day and "blowing saxophone on the weekend in a down joint." Is that autobiographical?
VM: Absolutely real. All that happened.
SD: During the seventies, you lived in America--first in Cambridge, then Woodstock, then for most of the decade in Marin County. Why have you now resettled in London?
VM: Well, basically, it's home for me. That's where I want to be.
SD: What part of London do you live in?
VM: Kensington, but it's actually Notting Hill, but I don't like saying Notting Hill because it has "connotations" [Notting Hill is a racially diverse, lively neighbourhood, whereas Kensington's reputation is more sedate].
SD: Before we go, let's talk about fatherhood. I understand you have a teenage daughter named Shana. Do you see yourself in her?
VM: Oh definitely! Any parent does.
SD: What kind of music does she like?
VM: Modern stuff. Rock stuff. U2, as a matter of fact. She likes classical, too. She plays piano and has had voice training. Sometimes we play together; she plays piano, and I play saxophone.
SD: How old is she?
VM: Fourteen.
SD: It's a difficult age.
VM: Yeah, but it's OK. She's going through her teenage years and I'm going through midlife crisis, so it matches up. We're running parallel.
SD: Van, you're going to be forty years old this summer. Albert Camus called forty the age of saints and suicides.
VM: I think I'd prefer to be the saint, thank you.

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

The Phrock Blog


I agonised about posting about the Phrock Blog.  It's a hotbed of illegal downloading but it does have some interesting reader comments about classic artists and albums. 

I found it while looking for information about Them.  It has a great review of The Story of Them.  Unfortunately, there is also access to downloads of lots of official material.  I don’t get it.  Why do supposed 'fans' have to steal officially released material?  Saving money?  Cheap CDs are readily available in all sorts of places.  Also, what's wrong with waiting until you have enough money to purchase an album?  I suppose it's all just part of our Western culture where everyone wants and expects everything now.  I can remember when I had so little and yet was willing to lay down full price to get those great albums.  I took them home and cherished them because they represented basically all of my pocket money or allowance or even the cash I got from my various part-time jobs. From my perspective I think a person develops an inner strength and is ultimately happier when he or she isn't part of the never ending quest to have everything now.  But that I guess reflects the thinking of a lot of baby boomers.  We grew up without a lot and didn't expect much. We're wealthier now but I think doing without when you have to comes easier to the boomer generation. Enough preaching.
   

Following are some excerpts from the Story of Them review and with some reader comments following:
Them were a formidable, popular group in their own right before singer Van Morrison went on to even greater fame.  This Belfast five only produced two LPs and a potful of 7" singles during its ascendancy in the molten heat of the British Invasion. But they did manage two Top 40 hits in America in 1965 (the enduring number 24 "Here Comes the Night," later covered glam-style by David Bowie on Pin Ups, and number 33 "Mystic Eyes") and two Top Ten hits that same year in their native Britain ("Here Comes the Night" and a cover of Joe Williams' "Baby Please Don't Go").
 And is there a single bar band in America that doesn't play "Gloria," shouting "G-L-O-R-I-A" just like the 19-year-old Morrison in 1964? Moreover, the group's West Coast U.S. tour of arenas like the Fillmore in the spring of 1966 had the Ulster youths commanding bills that included such admiring support groups as the Doors, Captain Beefheart & the Magic Band, the Grass Roots, and the Association.
 At one of them, Frank Zappa even joined them on-stage. Clearly, Them's tough, heavily American blues captivated, a direct result of the vicious voice of Morrison. Although the band chose songs to cover by John Lee Hooker, Jimmy Reed (twice), T-Bone Walker, Ray Charles, Screamin' Jay Hawkins, and Fats Domino, as seen here (as well as others by Bob Dylan, Simon & Garfunkel, and Bobby Troup), the real precedent for the white-hot, gnashing growl in Morrison's teenage voice was Howlin' Wolf.
True, his material could stand to rock & roll more. ..But still he comes on like some swamp-dwelling, moonshine-drinking, big man on the prowl. Them were raw and ready, and digitally brought back kicking and screaming from the original analogue master tapes, they are an eerie thing of bluesy beauty.
 
Some Reader Comments


frumious bandersnatch   -   That's a great idea to post this, Crimson ! 1st, it's out of print, 2nd it features nearly everything Them recorded with Van Morrison, 3rd the sound is excellent. And 4th, of course, the music is absolutely essential and amply demonstrates Van & Them had much more in stock than "Gloria".
I bought this years ago when it was still available and often go back to it.
kjelldahl    -   Best garage band...EVER::!
aldo   -   Make no mistake: ONE OF THE GREATEST BANDS EVER!
Bob   -   Another great gem. Thanks so much.  I'll take these boys over the Stones from the same era, any day of the week. An absolute stormer of a comp, missing only "Mighty Like A Rose" (because it's a demo, apparently, although it doesn't sound like one).
 
Why weren't these guys as big as the Stones? A dozen reasons. Doesn't matter. This really is the grail of first generation punk - put this up against (say) The Standells and hear how it should be done.

Charles   -   Thank you. I have never heard much Them other than the couple of hits on the radio way back then and a few Youtube offerings. I do have a large collection of Van so it will be interesting to compare and contrast.
hatari   -   I rate Them in one line with Stones, Animals, Yardbirds.  Their later LPs (Time Out! Time In For Them, Now - And Them) are also great but in another musical style.
mdhjhw   -   When I see these forgotten albums, forgotten artists, it is easier on my heart, because it shows that there are people in the world for which, in it's culture and heritage are extremely important. Music is part of human culture, and that band created the foundations of rock music, now a component of our culture.
Them are a very important band for me, accompanied me since 1965 and when I listen to Mystic Eyes I still have chills. Thanks for the reminder, maybe for some it will be discovered, certainly as a sentimental journey for me.
Pedro from Argentina   -   Hatari is right, go for the rest of THEM without Morrison too, psychedelic!.
Anonymous   -   Just a minor point but is this the UK or the US version? The UK version features a different take of "I Gave My Love A Diamond". "Mighty Like A Rose" is available on a rare German compilation CD and the less rare Genuine Philosopher´s Stone boot.
JeanBernardFrance   -   Them were great with Van Morrison but also later without Van Morrison.
crimson   -   Hello friends, thanks for all your comments. Yes, Them was one significant band in UK rock 'n' blues history. There is no doubt that Them have the same merit as for example the Animals or perhaps Rolling Stones. Although I am a more progrock.
  adamus67   -   Them were raw and ready, and digitally brought back kicking and screaming from the original analogue master tapes, they are an eerie thing of bluesy beauty.

Art Siegel  -   Thanks for an erudite appreciation of Them. Check out Lester Bangs' essay on Them, too. I'm sure it's online somewhere.  If I remember correctly, Morrison wouldn't give permission to use Mighty Like A Rose on this set, calling it only a demo.
nickprin   -   A real classic. Does anybody really needs comments for this one? Many, many thanks!!! - Ευχαριστώ πολύ!!!

Sunday, 17 June 2012

Another Version of Gloria


Despite his best efforts, Van Morrison is again linked to celebrity.   He claims “Hollywood, it ain’t no good” but here we have a Hollywood celebrity naming their child after a Van song.  He doesn't go looking for celebrity or celebrities but it and they seem to find him. 

So another celebrity has a baby and somehow it's nothing like what billions of ordinary people experience. It's all just so much more wonderful.  Or as the typical celebrity new mother says:  "I'm a hands on mother - I picked the nannies myself!"   

Maggie Gyllenhaal: Daughter Gloria Is Named After Rock Song

During her appearance on Late Night With Jimmy Fallon Tuesday night, second-time mom Maggie Gyllenhaal admitted she was a little out of practice with the film-promotion game.

After telling Fallon her second daughter, Gloria Ray (with husband Peter Sarsgaard), was born just seven weeks ago, the Hysteria star, 34, admitted she was "barely here." "She's a tiny baby . . . This is kind of the first time I've really left her!" Gyllenhaal revealed of her family's newest addition (who joins big sis Ramona, 5).

The actress also opened up about the inspiration behind her infant's moniker. "We thought of her name when we were at this concert that Patti Smith played at . . . she played [a cover of Van Morrison's] 'Gloria,'" Gyllenhaal shared. "It was a couple of years ago and we just thought, maybe we'll name our daughter that one day."

Following Gloria Ray's birth, Sarsgaard played a different version of the tune for his wife that almost had her regretting their choice.

 "My husband played me The Doors' version of 'Gloria' two days after my daughter was born, and it was so dirty, I couldn't handle it," Gyllenhaal explained, laughing. "It was like a super, super dirty version."

Before giving birth to Gloria's older sister Ramona in 2006, Gyllenhaal admitted that she "didn't have a clue" how rewarding, or challenging, motherhood would turn out to be. "There's no way to prepare for the challenges, the immense joys, the surprises, the disappointments, and the shocks," she told The Orange County Register in 2010. "Your heart just rips open."
Added Gyllenhaal, "It teaches you how to manage the unmanageable, and accept that you can't be a perfect mother all the time. If you try, it will bring you to your knees."

Friday, 15 June 2012

Van in Washington D.C. August 6, 2009


The following is a review by Ted Scheinman which appeared on the Washington City Paper site on August 18, 2009.  It reviews one of Van's Washington D.C. concerts at the Daughters of the Revolution Constitution Hall in early August.  A bonus here is the interview that follows the review.  The journalist emailed Van some questions and got replies!  
The Review
Van Morrison's gift was the ability to cop a religious experience from the little stuff--the shade of a redwood tree; Jackie Wilson on a staticy radio; a glass of water. Oh, and women--not for nothing was his first hit (with Irish rockers Them) an elision: Gloria, the chick, and gloria, the great hosanna.

That spiritual suggestibility came off rather muted on Thursday night, when Morrison brought his Astral Weeks revival tour to DAR Constitution Hall. Clad in his signature pinstripe suit, tinted sunglasses, and the fedora that's been glued to his head for the past decade, Van addressed the audience only once--at the end, to thank the band--and otherwise seemed more concerned with PA glitches than with, say, his immortal soul.

The current tour is the first in which Morrison has performed Astral Weeks in its entirety. In certain circles, this is a big deal. And while he isn't so much performing the songs as trotting them out, the thrill of recognition is enough to carry the suite. Chalk up some of that eeriness to the presence of Richard Davis, who played upright bass (arguably the lead instrument) on the original record. Over those freely wrought, back-turning bass lines, Morrison sang with his new voice--a bark-like thing with little time for dynamics but still capable of the righteous flutter and the tearful break. But woe to he who hasn't memorised the record: Morrison's latter-day delivery leaves much to the imagination, lyrics-wise; and the slurs and mumbles that once seemed inspired now seem merely unavoidable. Also: A woman in front of me laughed when Morrison promised to "stroll the merry way / and jump the hedges first"; and Beside You now sounds vaguely like a threat.
Northern Muse (Solid Ground),meanwhile, had Morrison showing off his facility on the piano, and while he omitted his traditional soul-growl from Listen to the Lion, he blew a churning harmonica vamp on Mystic Eyes. Van's still spinning a clipped cadence and being wilfully inscrutable, but the through-the-nose crowd lapped it up.
 
Interview Questions

Before the performance, Morrison responded by email to a number of my questions. His responses--terse and, yes, wilfully inscrutable--below:

Last November, we heard that Astral Weeks at the Bowl would be a one-off. What prompted the decision to tour?
 Because the Bowl was so well received, the demand grew. I originally intended just two shows in Hollywood, to get it recorded live from the stage, raw and uncut. And that was it.


While you've done songs like "Cyprus Avenue" in concert before, these shows are the first time you've played Astral Weeks in its entirety. Why never before? Why now?

Because this music is timeless, for one, and the record did not get any promotion whatsoever when it came out. These are the least performed songs in my repertoire.

One of the mysteries of Astral Weeks is the fantastic looseness of the band. On the subsequent four records--the exception, perhaps, being Moondance--your backing groups hew to a tighter, more consistent sound. Did you take a stronger hand in arrangements after Astral Weeks? How did the experience of writing and recording that album affect your approach in the studio?

Yes, their brief was to "follow the vocal." And that was exactly what they did, under my direction.

You've spoken publicly about your experience with stage fright. Has that fear dissipated with age?

I do not have stage fright any more, though I had it a couple of times in the past.

How does your current lineup stack up with, say, the Caledonia Soul Orchestra or the Caledonia Soul Express? Is there a different approach on this tour?

The Caledonia Soul Orchestra was from another time when it was all about going deep into the music and nothing else.

What will your next record sound like?

Whatever my soul dictates, I suppose. Good question.

What is the first record you remember listening to? The first record you bought? The last record you bought?

The first record I remember hearing was Bing Crosby on the radio--a song called "Please." The first record I bought was a 78 of Sonny Terry, an instrumental. I believe the last record I bought was Louis Armstrong--I buy those over and over...even if I already have it!

"St. Dominic's Preview," as far as I can tell, is a song about what to do once you've gotten what you've always wanted; for you, I imagined it was also about reconciling poetic integrity with commercial success. Is that fair? And can you please explain where the idea for the song came from--what is St. Dominic's Preview?
  I was writing at the time--I remember reading about a St. Dominic's Church in San Francisco. Also, there was a French song about St. Dominic, which may or may not be relevant because songs come in such mysterious ways sometimes....

This is a hobbyist question, but I can't help myself: If you could compose a band of any artists from any era, what would that band look like? E.g., James Jamerson on bass, Howard Johnson in the horn section...who would that be for you?

  I have been around long enough to know there is no "ideal" band. Bands are very individual and work to the musical goals. The ones I might choose may or may not be able to go where I need to go or grasp where I want to be, no matter what their pedigree is. That is a loaded question...but a good one.